<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doing organizational studies with Bourdieu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bourdieublog.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/doing-organizational-studies-with-bourdieu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bourdieublog.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/doing-organizational-studies-with-bourdieu/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy</title>
		<link>http://bourdieublog.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/doing-organizational-studies-with-bourdieu/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourdieublog.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-13</guid>
		<description>The Emirbayer and Johnson paper has opened up a new direction for me in my research on universities. I have used their study of organizations for the institutional study of the university. It extends the concept of field very practically, it is therefore conceptually easier, using,PB&#039;s conceptual framework as adapted by Emirbayer and Johnson to speak of both the university field and the university-as-field as objects of study. In their adaptation, PB&#039;s concepts as &#039;thinking tools&#039; are made to perform the kind of tasks that I think PB himself intended, particularly with respect to finding practical solutions to social problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Emirbayer and Johnson paper has opened up a new direction for me in my research on universities. I have used their study of organizations for the institutional study of the university. It extends the concept of field very practically, it is therefore conceptually easier, using,PB&#8217;s conceptual framework as adapted by Emirbayer and Johnson to speak of both the university field and the university-as-field as objects of study. In their adaptation, PB&#8217;s concepts as &#8216;thinking tools&#8217; are made to perform the kind of tasks that I think PB himself intended, particularly with respect to finding practical solutions to social problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
